London office+44 204 577 1145

Fraud and Asset Recovery Intelligence

Structured research where suspected fraud, connected parties, opaque entities or recovery questions require a clearer factual picture.

Fraud rarely arrives as a complete case. It is more often seen through inconsistencies, unexplained relationships, unusual transactions, misleading identities or assets that appear to have moved beyond the obvious reach of a claimant or office-holder. A focused intelligence review can help turn those fragments into a structured picture for further action.

Build the chronology

A reliable chronology can expose gaps between what was represented and what records show. Company events, appointments, domains, addresses, litigation, transactions and public statements may become more meaningful when placed in sequence.

Map people, companies and digital identities

Fraud and recovery matters commonly involve multiple entities, aliases, nominee relationships, domains or online profiles. Relationship mapping can identify where apparently separate elements overlap and which connections are verified rather than assumed.

Asset research is wider than a property search

Relevant intelligence may include corporate interests, property indicators, litigation, insolvency material, vehicles or vessels where appropriate, trading activity and jurisdictional connections. The aim is to identify useful leads and context, not to promise a complete inventory of assets.

Preserve evidential value

Web pages, domains, corporate records and other digital material can change quickly. Where a matter may proceed to litigation, insolvency recovery or law enforcement, preservation and source attribution should be considered early.

Escalate proportionately

The first stage should identify which leads justify more expensive enquiries, foreign counsel, forensic accounting, digital forensics, court applications or other specialist measures.

A first-stage fraud or recovery review may consider

  • Principal identities, aliases and addresses.
  • Companies, directors, shareholders and connected entities.
  • Chronology and transaction-related public information.
  • Domains, websites, social profiles and digital identifiers.
  • Litigation, insolvency and regulatory material.
  • Public-record asset and property indicators.
  • Jurisdictions and counterparties that may warrant deeper enquiry.
An asset indicator is not proof of current beneficial ownership or recoverability. Findings should be tested against legal ownership, jurisdiction and the evidential requirements of the matter.

Start with the suspected mechanism

Tell us what appears to have happened, which parties or entities are known and what recovery or protective decision is being considered. We can structure an initial intelligence phase around those questions.

Enquire now